The other day I picked up John LeCarre’s Tinker, Tailor,
Soldier, Spy, his best-selling novel about spies and espionage during the Cold War, and started
reading the introduction that he'd written in 1991 for the book, which first
appeared in the United States in 1974.
Two things struck me about what LeCarre had to say in retrospect
about writing the book, the first in a trilogy.
He had written a manuscript, an
unfinished version of the story, and had stored it for years in a desk drawer before he started writing the story in
earnest.
And that unfinished version didn’t even
contain George Smiley, the main character.
There’s a third point, too, and it's the most surprising point
of all, I think.
You’ll discover it when you read the excerpt below:
I have always wanted to set a novel in Cornwall, and to this
day Tinker Tailor is as near as I
ever came to doing so. The unfinished version that had lain in my desk drawer
for years before I started writing the story in earnest did not contain George
Smiley at all, but opened instead with a solitary and embittered man living
alone on a Cornish cliff, staring up at a single black car as it wove down the
hillside toward him. I had chosen in my imagination a spot not unlike the
little harbor of Porthgwarra in West Cornwall, where the cottages lie low on
the sea’s edge, and the hills behind
seem to be pressing them into the sea. My man was holding a bucket in his hand,
on his way to feeding his chickens. He had a limp, as Jim Prideaux has a limp in
the version you are about to read, and like Jim he was a former British agent
who had walked into a trap set for him by a traitor inside his own service,
called “The Circus.”
My original plan was for the Circus investigators to put
this figure back into harness, in a way that would provoke the unknown traitor
to try his hand again, and thus reveal himself. I wanted the entire story to
play in contemporary time and not in the flashbacks I later resorted to. But when
I got down to writing the book for real, I discovered that I was painting
myself into a corner. I could think of no plausible way to pursue a linear path
forward while at the same time peering back down the path that had brought my
man to the point where the story began. So one day, after months of
frustration, I took the whole manuscript into the garden and burned it, and
began again.
LeCarre burned the whole manuscript.
And, after months of frustration, he began again.
Burning the manuscript didn't mean he'd given up on the story.
It meant just the opposite: the story was starting to come into focus.
Try to remember this when you feel as if you've come to a dead-end, an impassable wall, and are ready to burn your manuscript.
Each draft, even those we feel we must burn, helps us get to the next stage.